Word Count: 624
There are a lot of
different views in the ongoing debate over both the risks and benefits of food
crops produced using biotechnology. There are those in favor of GMOs and those against
GMOs, both sides holding many different reasons for their stance. Some of the
biggest issues those against GMOs have right now are labeling laws, safety of
GMOs, effects on the environment and economy—especially in developing
countries—and the profit hungry companies behind GMOs. Some people want GMOs to
be banned all together. Others want to know when the food they’re eating
contains GMOs and if there are any long-term health effects of consuming GMOs,
something which there has been much speculation on. Many just want more
information, something the big companies aren’t currently providing.
Whether or not foods containing GMOs should require
labels has been a hot topic recently. At least twenty-one countries and the
European Union have established some form of mandatory labeling. But in the
United States, mandatory labeling of foods containing GMOs has only been
proposed, not enacted at the national, state, or local levels. Mandatory labeling
is necessary because consumers have the right to know what’s in their food,
especially when it comes to products that have raised health and environmental
concerns. Mandatory labeling is also important for consumers who need to
identify and steer clear of food products that cause them problems or that—for
religious or ethical reasons—they want to avoid eating, such as animal
products, including animal DNA. Opponents of labeling use the expense and logistical
difficulties of labeling along with their claim that no significant differences
have been found between genetically engineered (GE) and conventional foods as
reasons they’re against labeling laws. This issue could be easily addressed by
enacting a mandatory labeling law for foods containing GMOs.
The
safety of GMOs is also in question. Though mostly done in
Europe, Russia, and other countries, there’s a growing body of scientific
research showing that diets containing GE corn or soy cause serious health
problems in mice and rats. Though some scientific
studies have been done for Monsanto by universities, most of them were
concerned with the field performance of the engineered crops. These studies, of
course, found GMOs safe for the environment which to them also means safe to
eat. These studies need to be taken more
seriously. Government agencies need to replicate them instead of relying on
studies paid for by the biotech companies. Monsanto’s genetically modified corn
and soy plants that are all over our society are registered as insecticides.
Insecticides that have not been tested for safety by FDA. There are no
long-term studies that demonstrate the claims companies like Monsanto make that
engineered corn and soy are safe. What we have are the scientific studies out
of Europe and Russia, showing that rats fed engineered food died prematurely.
Scientific literature has studies showing that engineered corn and soy contain
toxic or allergenic proteins due to the damage done to a protein under
biotechnology.
The biggest thing that needs to be done right now concerning
GMOs is more research and more communication. The public doesn’t trust the big
companies—the only ones conducting research right now—for good reason. They
appear to care more about a profit than about addressing issues that many
people have brought up with their products. The first step is a enacting a mandatory
labeling law, then people can at least choose whether or not they want to
consume GMOs. If there are enough people that have a mistrust of GMOs, then a
lot of them will stop buying them and this will cause the companies to have to
address the issue. Step one being more research, and explaining their research
to the public.
Works Cited-
"10
Reasons to Avoid GMOs." Institute for Responsible Technology.
N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.responsibletechnology.org/10-Reasons-to-Avoid-GMOs>.
Byrne
, P. "Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods." A division
of the Office of Engagement. Colorado State University , n.d. Web. 18 Nov.
2013. <http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/foodnut/09371.html>.
Vrain,
Thierry . "Former Pro-GMO Scientist Speaks Out On The Real Dangers of
Genetically Engineered Food - Food Revolution Network Blog." Food
Revolution Network Blog. Ocean Robbins, 11 May 2013. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.foodrevolution.org/blog/former-pro-gmo-scientist/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment