Practically, there will probably never
be a solution to terrorism. It is partially an effect of people being
unhappy and really, as long as there are at least two people, they
are not always going to see eye to eye. This of course is a very
scaled down version but essentially, when there is a disagreement or
any given entity is frustrating another, they will in whatever way,
retaliate. And just as war will always be around, terrorism will go
right along with it. Would it not make sense that if there was a
solution to terrorism it would start being complimented as lives are
being lost at an exponential rate every year to terrorism. That is
not to say that people and governments are not trying. there has been
a vast amount of money, proportional to the increase in terrorism,
being spent each year by many countries around the world.
If there was a strategy other than the
“let make everyone happy and therefore would have no reasons to be
terrorists” dream, then it would be so inconveniencing to the
general public it would be hated despite the safety benefits. Think
about it, if the increase in security in airports caused so much
anger in the population, would a additional increases not make things
crazy in addition to the general decrease in the countries general
productivity. But this could significantly reduce the terrorist rate.
However, this would be relatively implausible because of the money it
would take to man, monitor and fix all of the new anti terrorist
systems. It seems that only with near infinite amounts of money could
a world truly without terrorism exist.
There are things people have said
about the elimination of the underlying causes of racism. This
though, is just like saying the way to get rid of gang violence is to
get rid of racism which is totally ridiculous, at least in the
foreseeable future. There are however other different theories about
how to get rid of terrorism but anything short of something that is
on par with something from the movies “The minority report” there
is no immediate course of action that is plausible. There are some
extremists theories that can “solve” terrorism in plans that sum
up to pull out of Iraq, invade and obliterate Iran and Saudi Arabia
and once things are destroyed, drop propaganda leaflets explaining
what can and will happen when the United States gets threatened.
Other extremest acts such as nuking
them all have brought up but indeed, this actually causes more
problems than it solves. First, right off the bat the whole world
would respond in a very negative war and as soon as the first
unfriendly nuclear capable country saw our nukes coming, it would be
a safe bet to say that theirs would not be far behind coming towards
us. Second, because of all of the destruction, wherever we nuked
would not be habitable for quite some time and there would be
refugees and victims everywhere and the death toll of the innocent
would be skyrocketed. Aside from the amount of hate from the rest of
the would that we would receive, there would also be drastic
environmental problems. Radiation would go up into the atmosphere and
anywhere near where we nuked would be polluted for a long time too.
Assuming that we wouldn’t not also get blown up, there would be a
total disregard for loss of human life or living area and our
environmental conscious went out the window, at last, we would be
blowing up an area that is rich in resources precious to the United
States and so all of these reasons show why it would not be a good
idea to “nuke them”.
As I have demonstrated, there is no
clear viciously effective way to get rid of terrorism. The most it
seems that we can do is being done by continuing to finance counter
terrorist organizations. It is possible that a militaristic withdraw
could help but then that leads into other issues such as whether we
are protecting people and other things of this nature. So basically,
we can keep trying and hopefully eventually, there will be a clear
system to eliminate all terrorist threats.
Souncres:
No comments:
Post a Comment