Monday, November 11, 2013

How the Main Motive Behind Big GMO Companies is Profit

Word Count: 618                            
            In defense of their agricultural methods, big companies in the GMO industry claim that GMOs are going to solve world hunger and are needed to feed the world. In reality, the majority of GMO crops don’t even go to feeding people. Only 2% of GMO soy is consumed by humans, and only 10% of corn ends up being directly used in foods, with about half of that being in the form of high fructose corn syrup. Most GMO corn is processed into gums, pastes, additives, fillers, ethanols and other products. The real push of genetic engineering is not to make third world agriculture more productive or to feed more people, but to generate profits. GMO technology has become an industry controlled by a few large profit hungry companies.
                These large biotech companies and their patents are gaining more and more control over the nations seed supply. It is rather challenging to invent a method that would only give the benefits of genetically modified organisms to the buyer of the product because the reproduction of plants is a natural process. Yet, Monsanto has found a way to protect its technology by creating seeds that produce infertile crops. This “terminator” or “suicide” seed makes it necessary for farmers to buy seeds annually from the biotech company. Another one of Monsanto’s popular GM technologies that creates a dependency upon the company is “Roundup Ready” soybeans, seeds that are tolerant to Monsanto’s herbicide roundup. Because Monsanto has patented the Roundup Ready soybean, farmers who purchase seeds from the company must sign a licensing agreement, agreeing to use the seeds for only one season, to not give the seeds to anyone else for planting, to not save second-generation seeds for replanting, and to not use or distribute the seeds for breeding or research purposes. Farmers traditionally save seeds from a harvest for replanting, which saves them the cost of buying new seeds and reduces their dependence on seed vendors. Monsanto’s is doing its best to stop this practice, wanting that steady stream of revenue from farmers who must purchase seeds every year.
The domination of the seed market by big agribusiness affects farmers growing GM and non-GM crops alike. Under the licensing agreement, farmers are allowed to sell second-generation seeds to local grain elevators, where GM and non-GM seeds are mixed and sold in bulk without restriction. With the popularity of GM seeds, this practice makes it harder for farmers to avoid purchasing GMOs. “Roundup Ready” soybeans now account for 94% of soybeans in circulation. GM contamination is another huge concern for farmers trying to avoid GMOs, especially organic farmers who can lose their government-issued organic certification if contamination is discovered. Wind or wildlife can carry seeds into the fields of neighboring farms, where they grow among non-GM crops without the farmer ever even knowing. Though the farmer never intended to plant GM seeds, this still violates Monsanto’s licensing agreement. Many farmers are worried about being sued for patent infringement if GM seeds contaminate their fields. Expensive legal fees make it difficult to defend against a lawsuit, and if a court orders a farmer to pay monetary damages, the financial results can be devastating.

The principle technologies on the market today reflect the need of biotechnology companies to intensify farmers' dependence upon seeds protected by "intellectual property rights", which conflict directly with the age-old rights of farmers to reproduce, share or store seeds. Now that these companies have a lot of dependence, they’ve also started to raise the price of their seeds. Biotechnology companies are determined to extract the most profit from their investment as possible by controlling crops from seed to sale and forcing farmers to pay inflated prices for seed-chemical packages.
Works Cited
Altieri, Miguel A. , and Peter Rosset. "Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology will not Help the Developing World." AgBioForum . University of California, Berkeley & Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013. <http://www.agbioforum.org/v2n34/v2n34a03-altieri.htm>.

Cooney, Scott. "The Economic Argument Against GMOs: a Top Ten List." The Inspired Economist. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013. <http://inspiredeconomist.com/2013/02/26/economic-argument-against-gmo/>.

Wright, Kristi. "GMO patents squeeze small farmers." Rogue Valley Community Press. N.p., 6 Mar. 2013. Web. 11 Nov. 2013. <http://rvcommunitypress.com/2013/03/gmo-patents-squeeze-small-farmers/>.

No comments:

Post a Comment